Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Cucamonga


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. /Keep, either way it's a keep. Consensus appears that the article has been improved over the course of the discussion. TravellingCari 18:10, 19 September 2008 (UTC)

Camp Cucamonga

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

I can't find any reliable sources for this television movie that shows notability. Schuy m 1 ( talk ) 00:15, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete non notable LegoKontribsTalkM 01:07, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep Looks pretty notable to me: shown on a major network and starring a large number of major television stars including John Ratzenberger and Jennifer Aniston. This would seem to meet the "other notability" section of Notability (films). --Canley (talk) 06:28, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Television-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.   -- • Gene93k (talk) 11:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete notability is not inherited, and we are not here to replicate the imdb. Darrenhusted (talk) 12:52, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete: Done and gone. There are hundreds and hundreds of these flashes in the pan.  I concur: we do not reiterate IMDB.  Utgard Loki (talk) 13:40, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep: A couple of mentions about Jennifer Aniston being in this movie, , . I found a mention in Entertainment Weekly that give a one line plot summary and a list of the top actors:
 * "Television Listings: TELEVISION THE WEEK AT A GLANCE A GUIDE TO NOTABLE SHOWS, SEPT. 21 TO 27." Entertainment Weekly. 21 Sep 1990. 13.
 * But more interesting was this Boston Globe article that mentions that this is the TV Comedy acting debut of G. Gordon Liddy.
 * John Engstrom, Globe Staff (1990, August 10). DOING THE RAITT THING :[THIRD Edition]. Boston Globe (pre-1997 Fulltext),p. 30. --Captain-tucker (talk) 15:12, 15 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep per sources found by Captain-tucker's diligent search that give the episode notability. Perhaps he might wish to add them to the article's external links so this does not come back to AfD next week or month?  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 16:46, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note Have added plot summary, cites, additional cast information, links, and wikified.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 19:17, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Good job. Something that has n easy-to-prove notability when first aired, would be more difficult to show 18 years later. Thank goodness for WP:GNG's "notability is not temporary." Good looking out.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:08, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Comment: The sources that CT found are only mentions and plot summaries so that does not show notability. Schuy m 1  ( talk ) 19:21, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Sorry I am not allowed to determine that an 18-year-old made for TV special is "no longer notable", simply because full reviews are harder to find. It was first reviewed in 1990 and launched some notable careers. It had notability at that time. It continues to be mentioned (even if marginally) over an 18 year timespan. This shows notability per WP:NF. And, per WP:GNG, notability is not temporary.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 20:54, 15 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Ha ha, he actually found it listed in an article called "a Guide to Notable Shows" and that's not notable? --Canley (talk) 00:56, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * Note My sources have been added to the article. --Captain-tucker (talk) 01:24, 16 September 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm sure the nom would have found it. Glad it was added, as trying to find information on 18-year-old notable shows can be difficult... though as proven, not impossible.  Schmidt,  MICHAEL Q. 02:00, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * Keep - Nice improvement. - Peregrine Fisher (talk) (contribs) 17:35, 16 September 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.