Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Flog Gnaw


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure)  Arun Kumar SINGH (Talk)  12:29, 22 November 2016 (UTC)

Camp Flog Gnaw

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No indication of passing WP:EVENT. No sources or any kind. Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 01:17, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep Google News has recent coverage in LA Times, Forbes, etc — Preceding unsigned comment added by Utsill (talk • contribs) 02:07, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * These are passing mentions. The articles are not about the festival but about other events and happen to mention the festival. They do not demonstrate notability. -- Zackmann08 (Talk to me/What I been doing) 03:22, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * This to name but one in music industry trade Billboard is not a passing mention, nor are enough of the others. Keep per above. Moreover the nominator is expected to do a basic amount of BEFORE. How much effort would it take him to click on the auto-generated link for "news" above and see that there are "available sources" in abundance. A second? Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 03:36, 14 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep I stumbled across it in a news piece while looking for something else. Ritchie333 (talk) (cont)  10:56, 16 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.