Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Lohikan

Camp Lohikan was proposed for deletion. This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was DELETE

There doesn't seem to be anything notable about this piece. It comes across more like folksy advertising than anything.
 * Lost VfD nomination. Keep. Cool Hand Luke  05:16, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Advertising. Delete. - Vague Rant 07:40, Oct 29, 2004 (UTC)
 * Keep, its a camp; the article is not a stub, and the information is easily verifiable. Posiduck 07:51, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * I just performed some surgery on it to get rid of as much as advertising as I knew how. It may still just be an ad. Weak delete. &#8212; Bill 12:45, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising. --*drew 12:49, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep. This needs to be rewritten for NPOV; smells of advertising. [[en:RaD Man|RaD Man (talk)]] 16:31, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Weak delete: It's advertising, and the granularity of covering for-profit entities like summer camps seems to me to be one step away from covering large car lots and particular stores.  Geogre 18:39, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. No evidence it's encyclopedic, just one camp of how many? Andrewa 21:07, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advertising. Indrian 20:38, Oct 31, 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Advert for non-notable summer camp.   &mdash; Gwalla | Talk 23:18, 31 Oct 2004 (UTC)
 * Delete. Wile E. Heresiarch 01:30, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)
 * Spam. Delete unless rewritten. - Mike Rosoft 14:11, 1 Nov 2004 (UTC)

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like other '/delete' pages is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.