Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Mendocino


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 20:06, 29 July 2017 (UTC)

Camp Mendocino

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Ineligible for PROD, was PROD'd in 2007 for lack of notability and undeleted shortly after a request from a user who advised "Camp Mendocino belongs to a non profit organization, is very traditional, and has existed since the 1930s."

While that all may be very nice it's been 10 years and still no sources have been added, and I couldn't find any of my own. The topic fails GNG and should be deleted. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 00:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:19, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. North America1000 02:20, 22 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete. As per nomination. Kind Tennis Fan (talk) 03:09, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete The article has had a decade to be brought up to notability standards, but since it has not, it can go.TH1980 (talk) 03:11, 22 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Notability is defined outside of Wikipedia, so notability does not change by editing an article. Unscintillating (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)


 * Delete WP:DEL7 with WP:IAR. An 85-year-old Boy Scout camp sounds like a topic of enduring interest, but without any reliably sourced statements, it requires a complete re-write. As for the IAR, AfD is not clean-up.  Unscintillating (talk) 02:34, 27 July 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - as per nom and above editors. Nothing to indicate it passes WP:GNG.  Onel 5969  TT me 19:36, 29 July 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.