Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Ozark (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. T. Canens (talk) 05:50, 20 October 2021 (UTC)

Camp Ozark
AfDs for this article:


 * – ( View AfD View log )

As per WP:Notability this article has no sources about anything except one specific incident, there are very few reliable sources available online except for their own website and a couple of passing references in local press, mostly in lists or in article primarily about other topics. The article has had a 'Needs additional sources' tag for over 11 years with none being forthcoming. JeffUK (talk) 16:25, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Arkansas-related deletion discussions. Shellwood (talk) 16:26, 4 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions. Radioactive  (talk) 17:50, 4 October 2021 (UTC)


 * Comment -- A camp used by 6000 people per year might just about manage to be notable. Peterkingiron (talk) 14:46, 10 October 2021 (UTC)
 * A camp used by 6000 people per year might, but the '6100' number in the article is unsourced (their website claims 'Over 7000'), their self-acclaimed popularity doesn't make it notable; my local cinema gets more visitors than that and it's not notable. JeffUK (talk) 21:19, 13 October 2021 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, 78.26  (spin me / revolutions) 16:59, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete - At present, this is no different from a lengthy advertisement. What makes this camp notable? - GizzyCatBella  🍁  23:05, 13 October 2021 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable in size, history, significance, controversy, impact, ownership or location. --Lockley (talk) 20:41, 19 October 2021 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.