Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp david GCC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was no consensus. North America1000 05:28, 1 June 2015 (UTC)

Camp david GCC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Wikipedia is not Wikinews. I dream of horses (T) @ 04:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @  04:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions. I dream of horses (T) @  04:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)


 * Delete - per nom. --Rpclod (talk) 04:42, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Delete - per WP:CRYSTAL and per nom. --Seduisant (talk) 04:48, 8 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Events-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 19:50, 9 May 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Keep Poorly titled and not sufficiently developed, but fulfills WP:GNG -- significant international news coverage over an extended period. Will surely be cited going into the future on U.S.-GCC relations. Plot Spoiler (talk) 20:55, 15 May 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 10:37, 16 May 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Davewild (talk) 09:02, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Summit ended 10 days ago and is still being discussed -, , , . I'm a bit shocked this was listed for deletion before the event even took place, although it had already received significant coverage.  —Мандичка YO 😜 09:18, 24 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep Some tensing is wrong, but it could use improvement and it has had significant coverage. SilverSurfingSerpant (talk) 13:06, 25 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Struck confirmed (by CU evidence) sockpuppet vote. Esquivalience t 00:24, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * Strong keep: The summit meets WP:GNG and WP:EVENTCRIT, has a wide geographical scope, and will probably lead to international agreements. Esquivalience t 00:31, 31 May 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.