Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campbell Ten-Point Pitch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   merge to Pitch (card game). Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:13, 8 June 2011 (UTC)

Campbell Ten-Point Pitch

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Card game. No evidence that it exists let alone that it is notable. &mdash; RHaworth 20:36, 23 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete I could find no discussion in reliable sources for this card game variant. Appears to be made up.  Not notable. Cullen328 (talk) 01:19, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Games-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 14:25, 24 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge into Pitch (card game). No, this is clearly not made up one day. The US has a huge variety of card games derived from All Fours / Pitch, and this falls neatly into the range of documented variants. Even more, it is a documented variant. The only reliable source that systematically collects local card games throughout the world already describes the rules. That does not mean that we need a separate article, though. The Pitch article already describes a lot of local variants, most of them still unsourced, and this one fits there very well and is actually sourceable. Hans Adler 16:38, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Stifle (talk) 11:29, 31 May 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge. Adler makes a very good point; it is shown to exist, but since existence doesn't equal notability, it can still be merged into the main game article. Crisco 1492 (talk) 13:44, 31 May 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge into Pitch (card game) as there is not enough sustainability for its own article.   ArcAngel    (talk) ) 21:22, 7 June 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.