Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campbells Automotive


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. (And, no, IMO, the January relistings were both not needed) Courcelles 01:25, 19 January 2013 (UTC)

Campbells Automotive

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Seems to fail WP:CORP - lacking substantial coverage by independent sources. Bear in mind that some ghits are for other unrelated businesses with similar names (ie in North America). bobrayner (talk) 19:36, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 20:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)


 * Delete for above and no inherited notability. The agency is not necessarily notable just from the individual notability of somebody associated with it.  It also does not give the reader any real information.  Blue   Riband►   20:46, 22 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Courcelles 00:18, 29 December 2012 (UTC)

 
 * Delete No evidence that this firm meets the WP:CORPDEPTH criteria. AllyD (talk) 08:19, 29 December 2012 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 03:21, 5 January 2013 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Sue Rangell ✍ ✉ 05:44, 12 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Delete - If this entity is worthy of WP coverage, is is as the publisher of Professional Van and Light Truck Magazine, which has an article. If there is anything worth merging, merge it there. Carrite (talk) 18:18, 12 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete as non-notable. — Ed! (talk) 04:07, 13 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: Wait, what? By the end of December there was the AfD nomination, plus two delete !votes from other editors, no other dissenting !votes or comments... was relisting twice really necessary? bobrayner (talk) 00:38, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Delete, coverage from sources cited is not significant (only consisting of mentions of the company's name) and a search only finds similar mentions, not enough for an article. Peter&#160;James (talk) 23:34, 14 January 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.