Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campo Grande (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Kraxler (talk) 17:33, 3 September 2015 (UTC)

Campo Grande (film)

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NFF and WP:NFILM. This film has not been released yet; and as per WP:NFF, it should not have an article. Yes, the Toronto International Film Festival is going to screen it, however, none of the sources state if the film is 100% finished. If you disregard that though, it fails WP:NFILM. 0 third party coverage. Google searching this one is difficult as it matches a location which isn't related to this film. If you look at the results that do come up; some are mirrors for the TIFF website listing, while others are promoted via the films production team. I don't feel this belongs here until it at least officially releases; and even then, only if it becomes notable. Appearing at a film festival doesn't assert notability, but if something comes out of said festival, then notability may become established later on. The Undead Never Die (talk) 09:54, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 11:39, 23 August 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep The nom hasn't even read WP:NFF - that is for films that have not been confirmed by reliable sources to have commenced principal photography. The film isn't in production, it's completed and ready to be screened at TIFF. Here is some coverage of the film: 1, 2, 3, 4 and the page at TIFF.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 14:14, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * A plot synopsis does not count for a source. (your 4th link) And, none of your links explicitly say that this film has completed production. If you want to get technical on that one. The third link isn't a review of the film, but another synopsis. Your BOA link literally only mentions the film in a small way. It's not a review either. It literally describes some of the people who were involved in the film; it doesn't talk about the film. The first link you listed starts off praising Latin American film presence slated for TIFF. It doesn't mention this film until 3/4ths of the way down the article, and then it's only to lump the name of this film in with the names of a few others. Once again, not a review. The Undead Never Die (talk) 16:12, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * There's clearly enough coverage across multiple sources to meet WP:GNG.  Lugnuts  Dick Laurent is dead 16:20, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * No, no there is not. The "coverage" you talk about for this film is nothing more than database style lists that just prove that the film is a thing, or they are slight mentions of the name of this film. Hardly notable for a film that hasn't come out yet. The Undead Never Die (talk) 16:44, 23 August 2015 (UTC)
 * alts
 * filmmaker:
 * co-writer:
 * studio:
 * actress:
 * actress:
 * producer:
 * producer:


 * Keep as it is not at all unreasonable to expect a Brazilian film to have non-English coverage, ina very quick look, and even if not the sole topic being discussed therein, I found it's production spoken of in a more-than-trivial fashion by Deutsche Welle in (Portugese) and interestingly, Oglobo (in Portugese) refers to it as an Agência Nacional do Cinema award recipient. I think this NEW stub best serves the project by remaining and being further improved over time and through regular editing as more is found or become available. Deletion is not always the best way to build an encyclopedia.  Schmidt,  Michael Q. 07:47, 24 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Brazil-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 02:38, 29 August 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, — ☮ JAaron95  Talk  09:10, 30 August 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.