Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campo San Bartolomeo


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. S warm  ♠  01:27, 1 August 2015 (UTC)

Campo San Bartolomeo

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

This article is unreferenced and doesn't assert any significance, and probably doesn't have any. Compassionate727 (talk) 15:50, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Italy-related deletion discussions. &mdash;&thinsp;JJMC89&thinsp; (T·E·C) 18:55, 24 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Comment This campo will appear in all of the travel guides because there is virtually no way to avoid when visiting Venice. It is also a common meeting point for Venetians. If travel guide information is sufficient, this can be kept. Other than the statue of Goldoni (which I don't think is of any great significance) there probably isn't much else to say about this. There are a few sentences (no references) in the Italian WP which could be brought over, or some minor info could be brought in from various guides. They, however, will mostly be giving instructions on how to pass through this campo to things worth seeing. LaMona (talk) 23:05, 24 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - Plenty of coverage found in seconds. and these are just ones found on the internet. By the nom's original research speculation "doesn't assert any significance, and probably doesn't have any" indicates no WP:BEFORE was followed at all. --Oakshade (talk) 01:52, 25 July 2015 (UTC)
 * Of those references, one is two sentences in a guide book. One is a mention in an article about a crime committed nearby. The final one is a statement that the character Brunetti of the Donna Leon books often walks through the campo. As I said above, you can't get to or from the (famous) Rialto bridge without walking through that campo, so it will very often be mentioned. None of these, AFAIK, are ABOUT the campo, they are mentions. There will be many mentions. Do these add up to notability? LaMona (talk) 14:44, 25 July 2015 (UTC)


 * Keep. While the stub obviously needs expansion and references, Google turns up with enough hits and there are articles in a number of other WPs, I see our basic notability criteria for geographic features fulfilled per WP:GEOLAND. This article has potential to grow, if given time to grow. I see no valid reason why we should not give it a chance. --Matthiaspaul (talk) 15:52, 28 July 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.