Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CampusTours


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was VERY SLIGHT AND WEAK KEEP per commentors. Which is the same as Keep. Herostratus 19:14, 13 September 2006 (UTC)

CampusTours
Contested prod. Questionable notability (see WP:WEB), Alexa rank over 190,000. Reads like an advertisement. The "in the news" references refer to the site only in passing or (in at least one case) not at all. VoiceOfReason 20:58, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Needs a rewrite, but is probably just notable enough. --RMHED 21:15, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep - concur with VoiceOfReason on rewrite. -- Whpq 21:38, 24 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Very Weak Keep and Very Strong Rewrite to be less WP:VSCA. Leuko 04:20, 25 August 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment - my inclination is delete, else I wouldn't have nominated it, but I agree with the above that this company might just barely reach the threshhold of notability. (Although it might not; again, the links that the author provided to establish notability are highly questionable.) The problem is that the article does not deserve to survive in its present form, and I think it's likely that the author (whose only contribs are to this article) is affiliated with the subject and may be unable to provide an appropriately neutral point of view. And I don't know if there's anybody else who's informed enough to write a good, neutral article. Again, the company, if notable, is just barely so. If this whole virtual-tour thing catches on, the company will probably grow in importance and in notability, and at that time unbiased people will be familiar enough with it to write an appropriate article. Until then, however, I continue to believe that the appropriate action here is to delete. VoiceOfReason 05:18, 25 August 2006 (UTC)


 *  AFD relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached.  Please add new discussions below this notice. Thanks, &mdash;Xyrael / 15:52, 2 September 2006 (UTC)


 * Very Slight Keep rewrite per VoiceOfReason Hello32020 16:14, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Comment does your Very Slight Keep mean you're withdrawing your nomination VoiceOfReason ? if so we can bring this to a close.--RMHED 19:19, 2 September 2006 (UTC)
 * Whoa. The Very Slight Keep was from Hello32020, not me. I continue to believe that the article should be deleted for reasons above. VoiceOfReason 06:46, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.