Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus Bellhops


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   no consensus. (WP:NPASR). (non-admin closure) NorthAmerica1000 13:40, 2 March 2014 (UTC)

Campus Bellhops

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional article for a firm with very borderline notability. The only reliable non-local source is msn news -- the USA Today article was in a special Student section and covered a number of campus service firms. They currently have 9 employees, and "hope" to expand, but the article goes on to quote the number of people they hope to have, and their subsequent plans after the first 10,000, We usually call that "not yet notable"

The detailed emphasis on the lives of the founders and the creation of their company that amounts to 2/3 of the article is typical of promotional articles, especially because hey usually have nothing else to write about.. (It is especially typical of paid promotional writing, but this may just be a good faith copy of that style).

Accepted from AfC a year ago.  DGG ( talk ) 05:05, 5 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Tennessee-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Business-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 01:50, 6 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Northamerica1000(talk) 08:40, 13 February 2014 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, buffbills7701 16:05, 21 February 2014 (UTC)


 * Keep. It seems bigger than DGG suggests, according to sources it has representatives at 115 or 116 universities around the U.S.  Those may be contractors, not employees, but that's fine.  Seems interesting, too. -- do  ncr  am  19:05, 22 February 2014 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.