Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus Crusade for Cthulhu


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. X clamation point  00:20, 10 March 2009 (UTC)

Campus Crusade for Cthulhu

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Tongue in cheek group based on the work of Lovecraft. The page has a single google news reference, and the only external links are to the group's webpage. There is no apparent notability warranting inclusion in an encyclopedia. Pstanton (talk) 03:54, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:N. Though, ARS has nominated it for rescue, so let's see how that turns out. Firestorm  Talk 07:37, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Just to clarify, anyone can nom for rescue, ARS folks specifically try to help. -- Banj e  b oi   19:31, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Aftr some discussion I've zapped the resuce tag, as it didn't really seem to be helping. Artw (talk) 19:05, 9 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. Fails WP:ORG. Doctorfluffy (robe and wizard hat) 07:47, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:ORG, and appears to have been more of a joke than an actual organisation anyway. Andrew Lenahan -  St ar bli nd  12:04, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  -- the wub  "?!"  13:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment keep per WP:ILIKEIT. Campus Crusade for Cthulhu: when you're tired of the lesser of two evils.--SarekOfVulcan (talk) 22:31, 5 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete even though I like it too. Lacks the basic prerequisites for article inclusion. Nice picture though. --  At am a chat 22:53, 5 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Comment I also like it. I think this is an amazingly cool idea. That doesn't the fact that it hasn't established itself as notable, and isn't referenced by any other sources. I REALLY do hope Wiki Rescue can save this article, personally. But realistically I think it should be deleted and hopefully someone can write a good article at some later date. --Pstanton (talk) 01:03, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - That's not going to happen. The article doesn't have any problems with the way it is written. The fact is that the Campus Crusade for Cthulhu itself needs to change. If it can manage to become notable in some way then an article on it might have a chance. But the article just won't be rescued, it can't be rescued, because the organization itself isn't up to snuff. Not everything that's cool is notable (and it's definitely true that not everything that's notable is cool). --  At am a chat 01:28, 6 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete. Interesting organization, but seems to fail WP:ORG. Stifle (talk) 18:44, 6 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Merge Everything is under control covers them as well but you'll have to read the book offline first. Certainly some of this could be condensed and merged, unsure what the best target would be. -- Banj e  b oi   19:29, 7 March 2009 (UTC)
 * I actually have that book, so if I managed to dig it out I could add the ref. Given the lack of other sources I'm not sure it would be worth it though. Artw (talk) 19:03, 9 March 2009 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:ORG.--Sloane (talk) 02:16, 8 March 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I don't think there's any content worth merging anywhere. DGG (talk) 17:50, 8 March 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.