Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campus Outreach


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 17:54, 13 October 2011 (UTC)

Campus Outreach

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Contested PROD. Promotional article. Fails WP:ORG. causa sui (talk) 19:09, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Christianity-related deletion discussions.  — &mdash; alf.laylah.wa.laylah (talk) 21:17, 29 September 2011 (UTC)


 * Comment. The existing article is certainly promotional and nonencyclopedic in tone.  However, I do suspect that this organization is a potentially notable multicampus ministry based on sources such as  and  and .  Or as a possible alternative, maybe redirect and add some information at the article about Briarwood Presbyterian Church, the megachurch that founded this ministry. --Arxiloxos (talk) 04:20, 30 September 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep and trim down or merge per Arxiloxos. While notable, some of the sections are promotional in tone and lacking in citations. Bearian (talk) 19:07, 3 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete fails WP:GNG. Stuartyeates (talk) 07:40, 5 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:01, 6 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Merge with redirect into Briarwood Presbyterian Church, which is the organization behind this activity. --John Nagle (talk) 20:12, 6 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep. Meets WP:NONPROFIT (just barely) with an international scope (US, South Africa, Thailand, Australia, etc.), and several sources, including those noted by Arxiloxos (it's hard to tell exactly how many sources, since the name is a common phrase). A merge to Briarwood Presbyterian Church is not appropriate, given the international and distributed nature of the organisation. The article needs a rewrite, however. -- 202.124.74.7 (talk) 08:56, 12 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep It seems extremely borderline, but the two references, where this organization was being used as an example to represent a whole field of like organizations suggests that the authors consider this organization important, and I think that is enough. It would be better if the discussion of the subject was longer, but I think this passes WP:GNG even if by a tiny margin. I have attempted to trim back some of the promotional and unencyclopedic content, though more cleanup is still needed. Monty  845  03:19, 13 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.