Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Campylactis


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE. &mdash; J I P | Talk 05:49, 2 October 2005 (UTC)

Campylactis
I've never heard of Campylactis, and a Google search doesn't turn up anything; a search of PubMed doesn't turn up anything; other random medical and veterinary medical journals I've looked in have nothing about it. The treatment is rose hips and grubs? I think somebody's trying to pull a fast one... --CDN99 15:54, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete unless shown to be real. Friday (talk) 16:53, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax unless made verifiable. Charles Matthews 19:08, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax in the absence of further evidence, which I strongly doubt will be forthcoming. Sliggy 20:27, 23 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax, "Campylactis" and "medical" results in two hits, this and one mirror. Alf melmac 10:01, 25 September 2005 (UTC)
 * I agree it's probably a hoax, but can you people please stop using Google as if it's proof of notability? ··gracefool |&#9786; 16:41, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as hoax. And Google is a good rule of thumb test, especially in the case of hoaxes (especially given that nobody is disputing notability here, as veracity is a more pressing issue). - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 16:44, 26 September 2005 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.