Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camryn Kiss


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 01:38, 29 May 2009 (UTC)

Camryn Kiss

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

non-notable pornographic actress. First criteria of WP:PORNBIO is not satisfied as she didn't win nor have nominations in multiple years. Trivial coverage in American porn trade journals, AVN and XBIZ. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:23, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been added to the WikiProject Pornography list of deletions. Morbidthoughts (talk) 05:35, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment - Is the first criteria supposed to mean that they must have won during multiple years or been nominated in multiple years? Or does it mean that they must have won just once or have been nominated in multiple years?  To me, it could be read both ways and I was reading it the second way when I contested the prod.  Dismas |(talk) 11:47, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Comment: The second way. That award listed is just an award nomination. She has not won anything yet and I believe she's already retired. Morbidthoughts (talk) 14:30, 21 May 2009 (UTC)

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, – Juliancolton  &#124; Talk 00:06, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * She has a good head on her shoulders so maybe we should just let her slide. Rms125a@hotmail.com (talk) 22:24, 21 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Living people-related deletion discussions. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:02, 22 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm not finding any evidence of meeting either the GNG or PORNBIO. No usable coverage found, just passing mention in movie reviews.Horrorshowj (talk) 05:05, 25 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.

 Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Fritzpoll (talk) 19:15, 28 May 2009 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so consensus may be reached.


 * Delete. Can't have a bio without sources. Rd232 talk 00:13, 29 May 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.