Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camunda BPM


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete.  Sandstein  08:31, 26 September 2018 (UTC)

Camunda BPM

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Non-notable software. Google finds no discernible significant independent coverage by reliable sources for or. Largoplazo (talk) 12:38, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Disagree. Try typing "Camunda" and you get more than 2 million pages only relating to this software. reliable sources for . Thechouchou (talk) 12:43, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * If you Google only "Camunda", how do you know how many of the hits are about the software at all, let alone independent reliable sources with significant coverage of it? And how could a source have significant coverage while never mentioning BPM or processes?Largoplazo (talk) 12:56, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete Fails WP:GNG. SemiHypercube ✎ 12:39, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Computing-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  13:17, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Software-related deletion discussions. Thanks,L3X1  ◊distænt write◊  13:18, 18 September 2018 (UTC)


 * Delete A Google news search only brings up press releases and blog entries. Fails WP:CORPDEPTH. Jmertel23 (talk) 15:02, 24 September 2018 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.