Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/CanSat


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was KEEP. postdlf (talk) 08:04, 31 October 2011 (UTC)

CanSat

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Article appears to be semi-disgused spam about a non-notable miniature satellite. Only references provided are to a company website. - Burpelson AFB ✈ 17:57, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Delete The references look more like an amateur tech competition than a professional company but this is still not notable. De728631 (talk) 18:13, 14 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions.  • Gene93k (talk) 23:48, 14 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks,  Rcsprinter  (Gimme a message)  10:07, 21 October 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, The Bushranger One ping only 23:39, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Weak keep - The article does have a distinct smell of WP:COI, but it does have the potential to be redeemed - I'll work on it later; this NASA paper may be useable as a ref, and this from ESA also has potential. Also, , , . - The Bushranger One ping only 23:41, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This article has been nominated for rescue. The Bushranger One ping only 23:42, 28 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep - There is a notability claim that can be made, it just hasn't been presented in the article. Agree with De728631: it is the lack of such a claim being made in the article that puts it at risk. (sdsds - talk) 23:54, 28 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Week Keep - Per the following:
 * • Book source: Rycroft, Michael J.; Crosgy, Norma; International Space University (2002). Smaller satellites: bigger business? : concepts, applications and markets. Kluwer Academic Publishers. ISBN 1-4020-0199-1
 * • Academic source: Berman, Joshua; Duda, Michael; Garnand-Royo, Jeff; Jones, Alexa; Pickering, Todd; Tutko, Samuel; (The Hokie Space Team) (March 2, 2009). CANSAT – Design of a Small Autonomous Sounding Rocket Payload Virginia Polytechnic Institute & State University. Apps.ksc.nasa.gov.
 * • Primary sources:, ,
 * — Northamerica1000 (talk) 04:06, 29 October 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep: Journal of Space Technology and Science (2000) article from a State Space Agency of Ukraine journal. Subject appears to have multiple coverage in countries like Japan and US. Pmresource (talk) 11:40, 29 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep The subject will become clearly notable after it has achived its mission, if WP:Crystal is a worry it will become less as more information comes out, here is a very promising potential Reference that could provide for very many opportunities for expansion of the article and additional information. – Phoenix B 1of3 (talk) 18:26, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * Keep This article is a good start on what may well become a very interesting subject, given the potential for more information as cited by Phoenix B 1of3 above.  Given patience, this will become a very good article. --DThomsen8 (talk) 21:00, 30 October 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.