Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Can you call on an ipod touch


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. JForget 00:42, 7 February 2010 (UTC)

Can you call on an ipod touch

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  )

Wikipedia is not a how-to guide I42 (talk) 19:27, 31 January 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete. I wish there was a speedy delete option because this is a hopeless how-to guide.   JBsupreme  ( talk ) 19:28, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete for same reason as above. -- Stroppolo talk 19:36, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete Perfect example of WP:NOT material... I also wish there was a speedy deletion criteria for how-to guides as hopeless as this. The Thing  //  Talk  //  Contribs  20:53, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete - Not only is this a how-to guide, it's also a pretty pointless one. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) &#124; (talk to me) &#124; (What I've done)  22:54, 31 January 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete as speedily as possible- Man, I tried...  I would consider it vandalism, so I marked it as that.  Totally pointless how to. Exactly what Wikipedia is not.-- iBentalk/contribs If you reply here, please place a talkback notification on my page. 03:02, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete. Agree that a speedy would probably be non-controversial, except for the fact that we have no speedy criteria to back it. If the author had been a Vandalism-only account, that'd be enough to trigger a G3 in my mind, but this is for all appearances a good-faith attempt at a guide. The fact that guides don't fit here is not material to that good faith. But, agree, this isn't encyclopedic. UltraExactZZ Said~ Did 15:21, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom as explicit how-to guide, preferably under the snowball guideline. --A More Perfect Onion (talk) 15:23, 1 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete this could've been easily prodded.  fetch  comms  ☛ 00:52, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * delete, as per everyone else and WP:SNOW -- JohnBlackburne wordsdeeds 23:49, 2 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete per TTTSNB. Cheers!☮ —Ecw.Technoid.Dweeb | contributions | talk | If you reply somewhere other than my talk, please talkback me. 17:30, 3 February 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete -- so tempting to speedy as an IAR... -- Fabrictramp |  talk to me  18:29, 6 February 2010 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.