Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canada–Kazakhstan relations


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep (WP:SNOW). King of &hearts;   &diams;   &clubs;  &spades; 17:38, 16 April 2009 (UTC)

Canada–Kazakhstan relations

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Entirely unsourced stub about a non-notable bilateral relationship. Relations between these two countries, rather far apart, are not extensive or otherwise rise to any level that would pass the general notability guidelines. The two countries have little impact on each other, and there primary contact seems to be at international hockey tournaments. Bali ultimate (talk) 21:38, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - This looks like a salvageable article and I may have uncovered some sources, I am going to attempt to expand and re-write this article now. - Marcusmax ( speak ) 21:42, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  -- J.Mundo (talk) 22:28, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Updated - I have updated the article substantially adding new references, new sections, economic and political relations and more please check it out before making up your mind. Thanks - Marcusmax ( speak ) 22:46, 13 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak keep Hardly the The Grand Alliance but it seems that WP:N is met. Nick-D (talk) 08:12, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep - Whilst it's not the Triple Entente, it seems that Marcusmax's work on the article has seen that it meets WP:N. DitzyNizzy (aka Jess) | (talk to me) | (What I've done)  09:36, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Sources suggest these diplomats didn't visit Canada for the hockey. / edg ☺ ☭ 10:25, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good stub after update.—Ëzhiki (Igels Hérissonovich Ïzhakoff-Amursky) • (yo?); 12:05, April 14, 2009 (UTC)
 * Weak Keep Hardly Earth-shattering but at least someone has taken an otherwise cookie-cutter stub and made something weakly useful.-- BlueSquadron Raven  14:03, 14 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Snowball keep very well referenced. Can we close it snowball keep now? Ikip (talk) 11:30, 15 April 2009 (UTC)
 * Sure! Keep. Good work, Marcusmax. Drmies (talk) 20:11, 15 April 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.