Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Bureau for the Advancement of Music


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy deleted per CSD G12, "Unambiguous copyright infringement of http://www.thecanadianencyclopedia.ca/en/article/canadian-bureau-for-the-advancement-of-music-emc/". N ORTH A MERICA 1000 01:08, 13 February 2015 (UTC)

Canadian Bureau for the Advancement of Music

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

A search indicates that the organisation doesn't have the depth of coverage required to meet WP:ORG. The organization has not received significant coverage in multiple reliable sources that are independent of the organisation.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  02:28, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * comment - there are a fair amount of hits in google books, most appear to be minor, but there may be enough to establish notability. Deunanknute (talk) 03:15, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - most of the sources added the article are only passing mentions of the subject  Flat Out  let's discuss it  05:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)


 * comment - the organization is almost 100 years old. there are hundreds of hardcopy files are on record (actually on microfiche) in the local library archives, however there is enough information online about the organization to establish notability. I will focus on including more independent sources and write original content for the article. Rajeevanm (talk) 23:02, 4 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment You can use hardcopy sources as long as they can be verified.  Flat Out  let's discuss it  05:17, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Music-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:01, 5 February 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 11:02, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, N ORTH A MERICA 1000 06:02, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * speedy delete - just noticed the copyvio, can't keep it as is. Could be remade, with notability sourced. Deunanknute (talk) 06:13, 12 February 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.