Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Consulate-General, Buffalo (2nd nomination)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Canada. causa sui (talk) 00:22, 29 July 2011 (UTC)

Canadian Consulate-General, Buffalo
AfDs for this article: 
 * and – ( View AfD  View log )

These two consulates don't seem to be covered significantly in independent reliable sources. (Speedy renominated as per closure of previous AfD.) ╟─ Treasury Tag ►  constablewick  ─╢ 15:38, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of diplomatic missions of Canada as this particular consulate does not have independent notability. I'm pretty sure that's how we've handled embassies/consulates in the past that fail notability criteria for a stand-alone article. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:42, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: TT added the Monterrey consulate to this nomination after I added my !vote. My opinion above applies to both the Buffalo and Monterrey articles. &mdash; KuyaBriBri Talk 15:47, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:36, 21 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Bilateral relations-related deletion discussions.  — I, Jethrobot drop me a line (note: not a bot!) 16:37, 21 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep/Comment Interesting nomination here that made me think long acctually about which way this should go and what to do with these pages. I dont beleive they should be deleted outright for sure and they could have already been redirected by the nominator at anytime. In my opinion these page would fall under standard alamnic entry for an encylopedia and should be kept - but purhaps they could be merged together or a new article along the lines of List of Canadian Consulate-Generals in the United States or something along those lines which would be able to outline each of them considering the lack of detail they all have. This would leave the list page open to expansion. I would be willing to make the page a reality; let me know if anyone thinks this is a good idea. Outback the koala (talk) 01:48, 23 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Kuyabribri. I note that this article has no independent sources, so presumably fails per WP:INDY, WP:RS, and WP:GNG.   Rich wales (talk · contribs) 06:18, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Redirect per Kuyabriri and Richwales. Doesn't meet WP:GNG. Maethordaer (talk) 14:24, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Merge and redirect for reasons given by others, but merge and redirect to Canada – United States relations and Canada–Mexico relations, respectively. These are more specific destinations than the List of diplomatic missions of Canada that has been proposed above as a target. Both of my two proposed destination articles would benefit from additional information on the responsibilities of the individual consulates general, whereas the list-article is not set up to receive additional content. --Orlady (talk) 16:08, 27 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.