Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Invasion


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. From the discussion this content does not appear merge worthy and is already covered in the proposed target. Spartaz Humbug! 07:08, 3 June 2020 (UTC)

Canadian Invasion

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

WP:N. Unofficial term not covered by a wide range of sources. Term is used by only two articles: one from 2011, another from 2017. They do not cover the broad range of the decade. Most of the article goes outside the scope of Canadian influence on American music, and is instead just a list of commercial accolades achieved by three artists. Nice4What (talk · contribs) – (Thanks ♥ ) 23:13, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Automated comment: This AfD was not correctly transcluded to the log (step 3). I have transcluded it to Articles for deletion/Log/2020 May 26.  —cyberbot I   Talk to my owner :Online 23:32, 26 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete not broadly used enough to show it is an actual widely used term meriting an article.John Pack Lambert (talk) 13:05, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Merge to Music of Canada. The term is still notable but there is no need of a separate article. D4iNa4 (talk) 15:15, 27 May 2020 (UTC)


 * Retarget to Invasion of Canada, a disambiguation page. TheAwesome  Hwyh  18:10, 27 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Merge to Music of Canada, where there already is a section by the same name. Retargeting to Invasion of Canada would not be appropriate because the latter is a disambiguation page, and because it lists invasions into Canada rather than efforts by Canadians to export internationally.   PK  T (alk)  12:52, 28 May 2020 (UTC)
 * How would this be merged into Music of Canada, without giving undue weight? Exactly what would be cut from the article? --  Zanimum (talk) 01:46, 31 May 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete outright. The subject has never gained significant notability - and not just in the strict terms demanded by Wikipedia but in any sense of the term in everyday life. The whole thing smells strongly of dedicated personal work - which, of course, is still personal work. -The Gnome (talk) 19:34, 2 June 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.