Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Libraries


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. Valid invocation of WP:IAR. j⚛e deckertalk 14:21, 5 February 2015 (UTC)

Canadian Libraries

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

non-notable directory Fgnievinski (talk) 05:20, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:04, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.  B E C K Y S A Y L E S  06:05, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Websites-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:12, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Museums and libraries-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 14:13, 13 January 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
 * Delete - Does not meet WP:N. Not finding coverage about the topic in reliable sources. Only finding citations, such as, , . N ORTH A MERICA 1000 19:59, 13 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment - Related discussion for American variant at Articles for deletion/American Libraries (collection). ~ Super  Hamster  Talk Contribs 20:34, 19 January 2015 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 16:48, 20 January 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Spirit of Eagle (talk) 04:35, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Comment – Per a serious lack of input here, pinging, a librarian, in hopes to obtain their perspective. Note that this is not canvassing, as I am not suggesting how they should !vote if they choose to. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 04:54, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * keep I'm not sure about whether what content would be most appropriate, but we need to keep the article.   Such things are important, especially in terms of our mission as a   supporter of  open resources,  regardless of whether  they   get written about.   It may be possible to justify it by the conventional GNG, but in any case I would justify keeping it by IAR. WP:N is a guideline, not a policy, and IAR specifically applies in such cases. It might be desirable for us to have other ways of handling material like  like this, but at present this seems the only practical way.  DGG ( talk ) 05:38, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – Upon further consideration, per 's rationale, vis-à-vis WP:IAR. The article technically also qualifies as a reasonable WP:SPINOUT of the Internet Archive article per WP:SIZERULE. Also of note is that the Internet Archive article presently has a merge tag to merge this article into it. Struck my previous !vote above. N ORTH A MERICA 1000 06:52, 28 January 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep – per comments above and at Articles for deletion/American Libraries (collection) – Margin1522 (talk) 11:42, 29 January 2015 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.