Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Lung Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) DavidLeighEllis (talk) 00:25, 3 July 2015 (UTC)

Canadian Lung Association

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

I'm not entirely sure if this is notable; it seems it was founded in 1900 and this says "Canada's first national voluntary health organization" and this says "country's national NGO dealing with tuberculosis". My total search are this (nothing significant, mostly minor mentions), this (results start to fade page 6), this, this and this. The current version is unacceptable and was actually worse here. If this is notable and can be improved, I'm willing to but I'm not sure if this all amounts to notability. SwisterTwister  talk  05:53, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  Everymorning   talk  14:38, 12 June 2015 (UTC)

Keep Similar to other articles on health charities. Could use better references but notable enough. EncyclopediaUpdaticus (talk) 19:13, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep - unfortunately it's self-referenced and somewhat promotional, but it's notable. Long entry on it in the Canadian Encyclopedia  —Мандичка YO 😜 20:00, 12 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Medicine-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:22, 14 June 2015 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 04:42, 19 June 2015 (UTC)  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, North America1000 01:45, 26 June 2015 (UTC)
 * Keep: meets WP:ORG; there is coverage in many reputable newspapers (e.g. The Ottawa Citizen, National Post, and The Gazette), however, subscription or access is needed. Esquivalience t 15:47, 26 June 2015 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.