Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian Telework Association


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  k eep. - Mailer Diablo 10:29, 28 March 2007 (UTC)

Canadian Telework Association

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

This article doubled in size recently from one sentence to two, but there doesn't appear to be much more to be said about it. After four months, it remains almost identical to the deleted American Telecommuting Association, which was struck for similar reasons. That said, I would withdraw my support for deletion if a strong case for notability can be made. MrZaius talk  18:19, 17 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Added expand and references tags. Also, I cannot find the deletion debate for the older page - was it prodded?   --Sigma 7 14:16, 18 March 2007 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so that consensus may be reached  Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Mr.Z-man  talk ¢ Review! 02:01, 23 March 2007 (UTC)


 * Keep. I added some references --Eastmain 02:44, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. As this was a semi-prod, I'm okay with the page being kept for a six months to see how it turns out and re-nominating it after that time.  --Sigma 7 02:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. After reading the article, I feel I know absolutely nothing about what this group does. But if there is 1000 members, including individuals and corporations, it must be up to something significant. Bobanny 07:48, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep and expand Looks like this organization is notable. I, like Bobanny, feel I know nothing about what the CTA does, but I would like to see this article expanded so it includes that information. — Tuvok[T@lk/Improve me] 22:08, 23 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep references appear to have been added indicating notability. --Infrangible 01:26, 24 March 2007 (UTC)
 * Keep. Good enough for now as a stub, but needs to be expanded. Realkyhick 07:12, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.