Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadian mining in Latin America and the Caribbean


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) SST  flyer  04:26, 13 June 2016 (UTC)

Canadian mining in Latin America and the Caribbean

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Unencyclopedic text pile, unclear about what the article is dealing about.--Kopiersperre (talk) 10:39, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Latin America-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Caribbean-related deletion discussions. GabeIglesia (talk) 17:45, 5 June 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep - I see no reasons to delete DeVerm (talk) 03:17, 6 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep This definitely a notable topic with reliable sources for referencing. However, searching google with the opening sentences reveals that this article is a copy and paste job from copyrighted sources. Looking at the sentences of the whole article I am sure the whole thing is a copy right violation.--- Steve Quinn (talk) 04:58, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep The organization and wording (especially the use of time constructs like "currently", "ongoing", etc.) need considerable work. However, this is a notable topic. Steve, this isn't a copy-paste job. The two sites that come up in the Google results (america.pink and revolvy.com) are both Wikipedia mirrors. Voceditenore (talk) 06:57, 11 June 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep as certainly convincing for its own article. SwisterTwister   talk  06:27, 12 June 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.