Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canadianman


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to List of Kinnikuman characters. Ron Ritzman (talk) 02:10, 25 May 2012 (UTC)

Canadianman

 * – ( View AfD View log  •  Stats )

Although the series is notable, I found no coverage for this character. SL93 (talk) 00:02, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Fictional elements-related deletion discussions. &#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Anime and manga-related deletion discussions. --&#9733;&#9734;  DUCK IS JAMMMY &#9734;&#9733; 00:20, 18 May 2012 (UTC)


 * Comment: I didn't notice the list of characters. Maybe this could be merged somehow. SL93 (talk) 13:55, 20 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect to List of Kinnikuman characters. Whats there to merge? On the character page I see: "Canadianman (Yonehiko Kitagawa) - A Canadian Chōjin. He was used in some way in almost every story arc after his introduction, making him probably the most recognized "Background Choujin" in the series" The description is short and to the point and can be improved on it. Throwing in WP:OR from this article into a character article that is already weighed down by it wont help but hurt the article. - Knowledgekid87 (talk) 02:35, 21 May 2012 (UTC)
 * Redirect per above. --Gwern (contribs) 16:42 23 May 2012 (GMT)
 * Redirect to List of Kinnikuman characters. A character from a series whose real-world notability is not establish by reliable sources should not have his own article. A mention in the character page should be it. Narutolovehinata5 tccsdnew 06:50, 24 May 2012 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.