Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canam Consultants


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Seems like the consensus is that WP:SIGCOV and other notability criteria are not satisfied. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk) 09:29, 16 December 2019 (UTC)

Canam Consultants

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Promotional company article. No significant in-depth coverage in independent sources. Speedy and PROD removed without significant improvement. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Stuartyeates (talk) 09:11, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi,Stuartyeates, hope you are doing good. if you need any proof about the membership. Then i have photo or certificates i can share with you..

Hi please clear me about the links which is not good according to you ? I can remove my links if you suggest me which links is not as per your guideline. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuraj Sandhu (talk • contribs) 09:49, 9 December 2019 (UTC)
 * As per the WP:GNG, what is needed is significant coverage in reliable sources that are independent of the subject. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:41, 9 December 2019 (UTC)\

I have updated some links about google books in references. And that search by your links., — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuraj Sandhu (talk • contribs) 07:13, 10 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: Poorly formatted article, no significant coverage (fails GNG, as explained by Stuartyeates). Also some COI issues and advertisment.  N0nsensical.system (err0r?) 08:56, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Hi , hope you are well,

I have added new links mentioning Canam. These links have the company's mention in Google books of verified authors, and verified journalists report links showing the media coverage of Canam. Please consider the changes for approving the Canam Consultants Wikipedia page. If you check the Wikipedia reference links of IDP and Edwise International, they are similar to the ones we have given. Therefore I request you to consider the changes that I have made by going through the links, and I hope they are good enough to make the Canam Consultants page live without any issues. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Anuraj_Sandhu (talk • contribs)
 * , please note that WP:OTHERSTUFFEXISTS is not a sustainable argument here. Also note that WP:ORGCRIT describes what is considered substantial coverage. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. AllyD (talk) 07:47, 13 December 2019 (UTC)


 * Comment: The WP:SPA author of this article has a clear WP:COI (e.g. ) but, despite repeated promptings, has not complied with the WP:DISCLOSE requirements. AllyD (talk) 08:04, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * Delete: A WP:SPA WP:COI article about a company, describing its services and affiliations but with no claim to encyclopaedic notability. The references provided may verify that it is a firm going about its business, but WP:CORPDEPTH requires more. Those references appended since the AfD began are no better: a mix of primary sources and routine listings. My searches found mention in a news item about a legal case but neither that nor anything else is sufficient to demonstrate notability. AllyD (talk) 09:05, 13 December 2019 (UTC)
 * delete AllyD said what I was going to say. The subject doesnt pass WP:CORPDEPTH/WP:NCORP, nor WP:GNG. —usernamekiran(talk) 06:15, 14 December 2019 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.