Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canberra Choral Society


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep‎__EXPECTED_UNCONNECTED_PAGE__. Liz Read! Talk! 03:03, 3 September 2023 (UTC)

Canberra Choral Society

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Tagged for notability since 2010. Fails WP:NBAND, WP:NORG, and WP:GNG. - UtherSRG (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC) Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz Read! Talk! 21:14, 29 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Organizations,  and Australia. UtherSRG (talk) 19:18, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 * Keep: Plenty of news coverage about this group, both local and national: Limelight, Australian Broadcasting Corporation , Canberra Times . There is also the book Canberra Choral Society: A Capital Choir for a Capital City ISBN 9780958155304, a commemorative history book published by a small non-fiction press, but it has been cited in a few scholarly articles. I can provide more sources if needed. Why? I Ask (talk) 20:09, 22 August 2023 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Keep. Sources listed above (Limelight, Canberra Times) book appear to confirm WP:NBAND. I couldn't get a glimpse of the listed book, so for my own certainty I found SIGCOV in a different book as well . &mdash;siro&chi;o 05:00, 30 August 2023 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.