Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancao


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Speedy delete. creation by blocked or banned user Beeblebrox (talk) 03:12, 31 January 2018 (UTC)

Cancao

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Article was PRODed by an IP user and contested by the creator. The rationale the IP gave was:

"Creator is blocked on commons (by a CU) and on Vietnamese wikipedia as a long term abuse going back to 2011.

Some reasons to delete this page.

1. A google search does not indicate existence of the place. 2. Thai and Chinese names indicate other places. 3. Vietnamese sources don't indicate it, but more of a collection of people living together instead of a political state.

Thus, please delete."

I have no knowledge of Vietnamese history, so I can't verify the claims of either party. But the issue seems serious enough to warrant further discussion. From a brief Google search, I gather that Cancao is a name found in historical Chinese documents, and which is largely agreed to have referred to Hà Tiên. So probably the History section of the Hà Tiên article should be expanded instead? Paul_012 (talk) 03:25, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * Comment: Just found out that User:Musée Annam is now globally locked due to crosswiki abuse and being a sock of User:Đăng Đàn Cung. This can probably be speedied. --Paul_012 (talk) 03:31, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Vietnam-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Cambodia-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of History-related deletion discussions. Baby miss  fortune 06:18, 28 January 2018 (UTC)


 * The discussion above is closed. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page. No further edits should be made to this discussion.