Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cancer industry


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was  --Stephen 03:37, 28 February 2008 (UTC)

Cancer industry

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Biased fork masquerading as a well-sourced article, intent on either making the industry out to be the bogeyman that keeps the disease untreatable, or to make it sound like it isn't a disease at all! Weasel words throughout, very poor stuff. ~ Riana ⁂ 05:38, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete WP:COATRACK article and novel synthesis of ideas too. This is simply anti-industry screed masquerading as an article.  --Jayron32. talk . contribs  05:58, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as nom. Alberon (talk) 09:32, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as per the above. Merenta (talk) 15:40, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete obvious POV fork. Any useful material can be added to the appropriate article(s). ≈ jossi ≈ (talk) 15:53, 22 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Note - This was earlier deleted by me, but on request of the nominator it has been restored. I presumed the creator was absent and would not contribute to the discussion, and therefore not provide any other reason for it to be kept (or deleted for that reason). Rudget . 18:34, 23 February 2008 (UTC)


 * Week keep commentators have not shown why the article is unsalvagable - WP:HOPELESS itself is not a reason for deletion. I have addressed some of the most egregious POV, and reformed the article to focus on the term "Cancer industry" itself. скоморохъ  12:46, 24 February 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. By reading this article, I have acquired a fuller appreciation for the meaning of WP:COATRACK. Wikipedia is not a publishing platform for essays propounding conspiracy theories. --Orlady (talk) 15:30, 26 February 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.