Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candle zombie


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete -- JForget  23:44, 10 July 2008 (UTC)

Candle zombie

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

This word was made by some people who are opposed to demonstrations which were held by people who are against the Korean government's decision about importation of U. S. beef. It was made to abuse people who participated in demonstrations to oppose the decision. It is just a Korean slang used by few people. (see Articles for deletion/Myungbaksanseong.) ..TTT.. (talk) 04:58, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment In ko.wikipedia, the article(ko:촛불좀비) was deleted at least two times by speedy deletion, and now blocked to create.--..TTT.. (talk) 05:06, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment Also, it has a NPOV issue. This word describes people who participated the demonstration as thinkless ones. I think it has to be deleted like Myungbaksanseong.--..TTT.. (talk) 05:15, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Korea-related deletion discussions.   —..TTT.. (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Comment There is no reliable source about this term. (see Avoid neologisms)--..TTT.. (talk) 09:52, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Strong delete Article fails WP:NEO, WP:RS, WP:V, and WP:NOTDICDEF. Wikipedia is not for something made up at the umpteenth-thousandth Korean protest one day.  L0b0t (talk) 17:30, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:NEO as an article on a non-notable neologism. (As far as I can tell, anyway - there are virtually zero sources about the term in English at least, and the fact that it's been deleted on the Korean Wikipedia suggests that they don't think it's notable either.) Terraxos (talk) 23:57, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism etc per above. The derivation is unsourced, and the gallery and external links are mostly irrelevant. EyeSerene talk 14:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as neologism etc per above. The derivation is unsourced, and the gallery and external links are mostly irrelevant. EyeSerene talk 14:55, 7 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Strong delete per all the above, especially L0b0t ukexpat (talk) 15:57, 7 July 2008 (UTC)
 * DELETE - I guess the creator seems to wish the unpopular term to be popularized through Wikipedia. (This is the first time for me to know it). It is even not comparable with the case of Myungbaksanseong which was deleted and remains as a just redirect. --Caspian blue (talk) 11:27, 10 July 2008 (UTC)
 * IMMEDIATE Delete - It was created in the Korean version twice before deleted, with no disputes.Vnvnfls (talk) 22:55, 10 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.