Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy Rain (film)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was speedy keep, nomination withdrawn. (NAC) --J.Mundo (talk) 04:53, 13 January 2009 (UTC)

Candy Rain (film)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Delete. Um...patent nonsense or just an advert for a NN film? CaveatLector Talk Contrib 04:21, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Tentative Keep This doesn't work as WP:NONSENSE; it has a subject that you can understand well enough (though sidebar data spilling into the opening is a problem). Nor does it read like an advertisement. I fetched the zh article and linked it; my Chinese isn't very hot, so I can't establish notability, but I will say that the Chinese title (花吃了那女孩) yields a ton of search hits, and most of the actors (主演) have their own articles with decent amounts of content and (also linked) work history. Obviously this article needs work, but at first glance I think it deserves to exist. Estemi (talk) 04:52, 12 January 2009 (UTC)


 * Keep - I checked via a google search before moving this article to its new location from the original Chinese title and there does appear to be quite a lot about this film, although it is mostly in Chinese. It is certainly not nonsense, and I didn't read it as being too advert-y either, otherwise I would have tagged it for speedy.  I agree with Estemi, it needs cleanup, but that's not a reason to delete it. --  role player 10:43, 12 January 2009 (UTC)
 * Since it's been mentioned a lot in Chinese media, I'll withdraw the nomination then, but I'll ask somebody familiar with the film or with Chinese cinema to cleanup the article and make sure it gets de-orphaned. CaveatLector Talk Contrib 02:37, 13 January 2009 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.