Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candy bouquet


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Kurykh (talk) 00:35, 10 April 2017 (UTC)

Candy bouquet

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

(Serious nomination) Article has zero sources. No reliable sources online, just advertisements. Fails WP:GNG. Delete. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:40, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 22:57, 1 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Visual arts-related deletion discussions. Mr. Guye (talk) 01:06, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

 Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus. Relisting comment: The log of April 1 is overfilled
 * Delete - started out as pure promotion ten years ago and has devolved into complete non-notability.Glendoremus (talk) 05:12, 2 April 2017 (UTC)

Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, -KAP03(Talk &bull;&#32;Contributions &bull;&#32;Email) 14:16, 2 April 2017 (UTC)
 * Delete - After the very obvious promotion was removed from the article, there was very little left, and what was there was unsourced. Looking for sources, plenty of hits come up, but these seem to be entirely made up of product pages or "how-to" guides and videos, and nothing that discusses the concept in any meaningful way that would give it notability.  64.183.45.226 (talk) 17:45, 4 April 2017 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.