Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Candysuck


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Missvain (talk) 01:35, 15 December 2020 (UTC)

Candysuck

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Not notable GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:09, 7 December 2020 (UTC)

Non-notable band. The article is sourced solely to Discogs and Musicbrainz, which are not reliable. During a Google search I haven't found anything reliable, only databases, youtube videos, streaming links, trivial mentions/name checks (there are lots of those), and some blogs. No reliable sources are available, therefore I think the band is not notable. The sourcing isn't better on the Swedish Wiki either. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:07, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Bands and musicians-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sweden-related deletion discussions. GhostDestroyer100 (talk) 18:08, 7 December 2020 (UTC)


 * Delete Non notable. Does not meet musician notability guidelines.Peter303x (talk) 22:18, 8 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete -  per nom . No evidence of Notability Samat lib (talk) 19:51, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete per nom. Kolma8 (talk) 22:40, 9 December 2020 (UTC)
 * Delete - Meets neither WP:GNG or WP:MUSICBIO.  Onel 5969  TT me 18:08, 13 December 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.