Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canegrati's formulae


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   delete. Ron Ritzman (talk) 01:22, 8 January 2011 (UTC)

Canegrati's formulae

 * – ( View AfD View log )

Non-notable concept, apparently self-named by the author. There are 4 works cited. The two works cited that are not written by Canegrati himself pre-date 'Canegrati's formulae', and so cannot establish it's notability. The two papers by Canegrati are MPRA papers, which are working papers uploaded to the Munich Personal RePEc Archive – these are essentially self-published and hence are not reliable sources. A google scholar search for "Canegrati's formulae" or "Canegrati's formula" return no results. A general google search returns Wikipedia articles and mirrors. LK (talk) 06:38, 31 December 2010 (UTC)


 * Delete unless more sources for notability are found. The RS in the article would be the Mulligan and Sala-i-Martin NBER article and the Political Economics by Persson and Tabellini; however, the word "Canegrati" does not appear in either of these publications and it looks like these two sources are used to cite more general statements (in a somewhat misleading way suggesting that they refer to this specific formula, but AGF and all that). Volunteer Marek (talk) 07:00, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * There's discussion on Talk:Single-mindedness theory that might be relevant, although a similar (somewhat ad hominem) discussion can be found on this article's talk page too. Uncle G (talk) 12:59, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Delete unless/until at least one peer-reviewed published source is provided. CRGreathouse (t | c) 21:10, 31 December 2010 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Politics-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Social science-related deletion discussions.  -- • Gene93k (talk) 20:21, 1 January 2011 (UTC)
 * Delete - non-notable idea by a non-notable academic. I have had dozens of those.... Bearian (talk) 16:01, 5 January 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.