Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannella Spirits


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was delete. Jo-Jo Eumerus (talk, contributions) 06:43, 25 November 2016 (UTC)

Cannella Spirits

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

Per WP:NCORP, WP:TOOSOON (company is only 2 years old), and WP:advert (references are mostly advertisements for the products, not reviews or awards). The one award THAT establish any sort of notability is from Playboy.com. I think a company in the spirits industry needs more independent coverage than what is currently available in order to meet WP:GNG and every other policy cited above. Comatmebro User talk:Comatmebro 03:43, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Food and drink-related deletion discussions. Everymorning (talk) 04:10, 17 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete - Subject lacks notability and any kind of coverage in RS. Meatsgains (talk) 04:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of California-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 22:13, 19 November 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete as corporate spam. K.e.coffman (talk) 06:41, 24 November 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.