Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannock Hockey Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   keep. v/r - TP 17:18, 12 July 2011 (UTC)

Cannock Hockey Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

There isn't sufficient coverage of the club by independent sources failing WP:CLUB. While there is a claim of importance it is unsupported by evidence and is not possible to verify. --Mrmatiko (talk) 15:18, 28 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Sports-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions.  — • Gene93k (talk) 18:04, 29 June 2011 (UTC)


 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Ron Ritzman (talk) 00:03, 5 July 2011 (UTC)

 
 * Keep - I've added a couple of refs to back up the club's notability, and I'll try and find some more. 81.142.107.230 (talk) 11:56, 5 July 2011 (UTC)
 * Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.


 * Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, v/r - TP 00:29, 12 July 2011 (UTC)


 * Keep I feel that the sources in the article are enough to establish the notabiltiy of the club, along with the fact that they play in one of the top field hockey leagues in England. Also having won several championships over the past decade is nothing to sneeze at.  However, I have placed an additional tag on the article because there is close paraphrasing going on from one of the sources I looked at, so the article would need a slight re-write to take care of that issue.    ArcAngel    (talk) ) 16:25, 12 July 2011 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.