Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cannonization

 This page is an archive of the discussion about the proposed deletion of the article below. This page is no longer live. Further comments should be made on the article's talk page rather than here so that this page is preserved as an historic record. The result of the debate was redirect. Page has been redirected to canonization. Joyous 03:40, Jan 19, 2005 (UTC)

Cannonization
This article still has a VfD notice, but is no longer actually listed on VfD (or was it ever?) Was this ever resolved? -- Curps 07:50, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Yes, it was listed on vfd. As most votes are for deletion or redirection, I've redirected to canonization. Wile E. Heresiarch 19:51, 17 Jan 2005 (UTC)


 * Obscure Simpsons triva. Neutralitytalk 04:08, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- DCEdwards1966 04:10, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep It's a real word. Search it on Wikipedia. [ by 68.251.209.16 04:21, 1 Jan 2005]
 * Uh, yeah. It's a real word because it's on Wikipedia.  Now that's circular logic.  Delete.  RickK 22:46, Jan 6, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete: Real word spelt wrongly and incorrectly defined by obscure Simpsons trivia. --Kevin 04:28, Jan 1, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --fvw *  04:40, 2005 Jan 1 (UTC)
 * Delete--ZayZayEM 06:26, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep for the time being, ideally move/merge to episode article. The content will be sorted out eventually, unless we delete it first. Everyking 06:35, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Keep, supporting Everyking Kappa 07:50, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, dicdef. iMeowbot~Mw 08:42, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Dicdef? It's a joke from an episode of The Simpsons. You think that should be in a dictionary? Everyking 08:44, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * I don't think that it belongs in a serious dictionary either. That's why I voted to delete, not to transwiki. iMeowbot~Mw 09:35, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, non-encyclopedic Simpsons fancruft. Rje 13:27, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. This was a bad joke before the Simpsons used it. DJ Clayworth 17:42, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete this trivial but funny bit of cruft. Wyss 22:16, 1 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete, not notable enough for inclusion. Megan1967 03:18, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to canonization (plausible misspelling), do not merge. Wile E. Heresiarch 08:44, 2 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, no merge. -Sean Curtin 06:56, Jan 3, 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Cleduc 07:05, 3 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect without merge. GRider\talk 23:32, 5 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect, no merge &rarr;I&ntilde;g&#333;lemo&larr;  (talk)  03:51, 2005 Jan 6 (UTC)
 * Redirect to canonization, without merge, as with Wile E. Heresiarch. -- Hadal 04:13, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect (w/o merge) seems reasonable. RadicalSubversiv E 13:02, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Redirect to canonization without merge. Martg76 22:43, 6 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete -- Curps 07:45, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete --Melaen 11:42, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Made-up words in The Simpsons -- Kaizersoze 18:52, Jan 15, 2005 (UTC)
 * Merge with Made-up words in The Simpsons --Bart133 19:50, 15 Jan 2005 (UTC)
 * Nope, the VfD is still alive. However, since no one is taking any action, I vote, Keep.

This page is now preserved as an archive of the debate and, like some other VfD subpages, is no longer 'live'. Subsequent comments on the issue, the deletion or on the decision-making process should be placed on the relevant 'live' pages. Please do not edit this page.