Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canon ISDC


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was procedural close. Article deleted 21:58, 30 July 2016 by Jo-Jo Eumerus under G7. (non-admin closure) Sam Sailor Talk! 07:42, 31 July 2016 (UTC)

Canon ISDC

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No evidence that the subject meets WP:ORGDEPTH notability. - MrX 13:24, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Please see the references added in list. It include newspaper article also.


 * Delete - companies claiming to provide "best-in-class solutions" are not inherently notable. . . Mean as custard (talk) 13:47, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Companies-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Technology-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions. Shawn in Montreal (talk) 14:13, 24 July 2016 (UTC)


 * Delete. Inappropriate for a separate article.  DGG ( talk ) 14:38, 24 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete. Too minor for inclusion. Xxanthippe (talk) 22:31, 24 July 2016 (UTC).
 * Delete and I consider this hinting at A7 and G11 material, nothing at all convincing. SwisterTwister   talk  18:44, 26 July 2016 (UTC)
 * Delete - fails WP:BRANCH, a non-notable element of a notable company. Blythwood (talk) 17:58, 28 July 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.