Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantabile (disambiguation)


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was Delete a pointless dab page. Black Kite 20:47, 6 April 2008 (UTC)

Cantabile (disambiguation)

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

only one of the examples, Nodame Cantabile, is notable. The others are not notable. There is no need for a disambiguation page. So it should be deleted. Kingturtle (talk) 00:27, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. The absence of an article does not mean that the subject is not notable. It seems quite possible that each of the redlinks could become an article if suitable coverage can be found. And there are other organizations with Cantabile as part of their name which might be notable, such as http://www.corocantabile.es/ or http://www.cantabile.strayorange.com/ I was surprised to see that there is no it:Cantabile article in the Italian Wikipedia at http://it.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantabile --Eastmain (talk) 00:46, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * My concern is not that they are redlinks. My concern is that I haven't found suitable coverage for any of those redlinks. It is unlikely that any of those articles would survive an AfD themselves even if they were made. Kingturtle (talk) 00:51, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary dab page. Most of the red links are guaranteed to stay red links (red link, red link, red link -- I can't help myself); therefore, this dab page isn't necessarry. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 01:00, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Keep. I removed all the redlinks, which don't seem to be notable enough for future articles. However, there's one notable blue link left and that should suffice for a dab page. My overall philosophy (if I may pontificate) in approaching the afds's is to see what articles cheapen this encyclopedia and what articles do not. An arguably unnecessary dab page doesn't in any way cheapen this project, so I'm looking for any reason to keep. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 02:10, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * One notable link does not constitute a disamb, it constitutes a redirect. Kingturtle (talk) 03:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I'm not sure what you mean. Cantabile may refer to two things, the musical term and the manga. What should redirect to what?-- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:35, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * We don't need a (disambiguation) page for that. The Manga can be mentioned atop Cantabile. Kingturtle (talk) 04:37, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * That, I agree with. I guess that's what you originally meant. -- brew crewer  (yada, yada) 04:41, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * I definitely said it better the 2nd time. :) Kingturtle (talk) 17:06, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete. Per disambig. Since there appears to be no significant risk of confusion of the two article titles that remain on the disambig, there really isn't a rational reason to keep. SynergeticMaggot (talk) 02:45, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as unnecessary; a link to Nodame Cantabile at the top of the article cantabile would work just fine.  ~EdGl  04:16, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as it is short—even for a disambiguation page. – thedemonhog   talk  •  edits  16:33, 6 April 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.