Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canterbury University Tramping Club


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was redirect to University of Canterbury. &spades;PMC&spades; (talk) 02:17, 19 November 2020 (UTC)

Canterbury University Tramping Club

 * – ( View AfD View log )

The coverage (references, external links, etc.) does not seem sufficient to justify this article passing General notability guideline and the more detailed Notability (organizations) requirement. WP:BEFORE did not reveal any significant coverage on Gnews, Gbooks or Gscholar. Claim of "one of the lagest" failed (cited ref is just a regular listing on the uni's page), also not even mentioned at University_of_Canterbury, where it could redirect if anyone finds a single reliable source that would warrant merging something there. There are a few passing mentions, but nothing in the article seems salvageable as the refs are either PRIMARY, likely unreliable, in passing or fail verification. Two months ago User:Schwede66 who deprodded it suggested on article's talk there may be sources, but since then the discussion stalled and the article hasn't been improved. I guess it's time to revisit it at AfD. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 06:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Education-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of New Zealand-related deletion discussions. Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here  06:51, 10 November 2020 (UTC)


 * Comment Just a note that back then, I wrote to the club's president and their secretary. Didn't hear anything back from either of them. So if they themselves aren't willing or able to help, then maybe it's time to apply the nuclear option. That said, would you know any of them personally, Podzemnik?  Schwede 66  08:40, 10 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. Coolabahapple (talk) 01:43, 11 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. Necrothesp (talk) 11:36, 11 November 2020 (UTC)

Redirect to University_of_Canterbury. Since this article doesn't pass either WP:GNG or WP:NORG, but a redirect is perfectly fine IMO. The section in the universities article about student associations could use some fleshing out when it comes to what clubs they offer anyway. --Adamant1 (talk) 04:59, 12 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Keep there are many published reports of these folks. Things like https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19340530.2.81 Bear in mind that's in a paper from a different city, the Christchurch (local) news papers haven't been digitised. I have no doubt that there are many, many, offline sources to support this article in The Press. Stuartyeates (talk) 18:52, 16 November 2020 (UTC)
 * WP:THEREMUSTBESOURCES. We can't assume that. --Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus&#124; reply here 07:18, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to University of Canterbury: to the appropriate section. imo article does not have SIGCOV for a stand alone article, content with IS RS can be included in the target article.    // Timothy ::  talk  08:21, 17 November 2020 (UTC)
 * Redirect to University_of_Canterbury, even if there are sources I don't see this being a useful WP:SPLIT, the main article is nowhere near large enough. Devonian Wombat (talk) 06:20, 18 November 2020 (UTC)
 * '''Redirect to University of Canterbury.Pharaoh of the Wizards (talk) 23:59, 18 November 2020 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.