Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canterbury cathedral facts


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Redirected to Canterbury Cathedral, not that implausible and redirects are cheap. NawlinWiki (talk) 20:46, 9 November 2009 (UTC)

Canterbury cathedral facts

 * – (View AfD) (View log)


 * Delete. Unencyclopeadic. -- Alan Liefting (talk) - 20:24, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * I can be brief too: delete. Drmies (talk) 20:26, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Or, to expand a little, nothing in here isn't already in Canterbury Cathedral, and the title is an implausible redirect--besides, the information in here is random and unverified. Drmies (talk) 20:27, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete. I am not familiar with the cathedral itself, but I can say we don't need fact-pages about places here in Wikipedia. Facts can be included in main article if necessary (if there is one - if not, then create one).  Ilyushka88   talk  20:28, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per Drmies. --Barret (talk) 20:31, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * Delete per WP:NOTTRAVEL. Any useful facts can be put into the main article, we don't need a separate article for them. Regards, MacMedtalk stalk 20:32, 9 November 2009 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.