Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canterville - The musical


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   redirect to The Canterville Ghost. Mark Arsten (talk) 18:59, 4 February 2013 (UTC)

Canterville - The musical

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

No assertion of notability per WP:GNG; zero coverage online from WP:Reliable sources. Prod contested without comment by anonymous IP account. Altered Walter (talk) 16:03, 28 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Arts-related deletion discussions. Altered Walter (talk) 16:04, 28 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Canterville Ghost which briefly mentions this musical. This title is a possible search result, although someone's unlikely to type this exact name with that punctuation and capitalization. The musical isn't notable; there's a lack of media coverage from Google search results. --Colapeninsula (talk) 10:49, 29 January 2013 (UTC)
 * Comment: My issue with including this particular adaptation of TCG in the main article is that there wasn't really anything out there to suggest that it is particularly noteworthy. I'll do another search, but when I'd researched this via PROD I didn't see where it'd received any coverage to where it'd be worth redirecting and mentioning. I can see perhaps using the title as a general redirect, but I'm not sure that this specific musical would be worth mentioning. It exists, but it doesn't seem to be any more notable than any of the various "musical interpretation of X" that get made and performed each year.Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡)   04:32, 30 January 2013 (UTC)


 * Redirect to The Canterville Ghost. This musical seems to have had just a single concert performance, last November. Listings in various blogs and music event directories, but nothing substantial in a reliable source, that I could see. --Hobbes Goodyear (talk) 12:19, 4 February 2013 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.