Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantonese wedding


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result was no consensus. Chick Bowen 18:27, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

Cantonese wedding

 * – (View AfD) (View log)

Everything on this page is already included in Chinese marriage — Preceding unsigned comment added by Benjwong (talk • contribs) 2007/06/20 22:17:17
 * This AfD nomination was incomplete. It is listed now. DumbBOT 14:05, 21 June 2007 (UTC)


 * Comment I don't see it that way. Chinese marriage, if that's the article intended by the nom, does not contain the search string "Canton" anywhere, nor much of the content.  However, merging could be a solution. Yechiel Man  14:23, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * When you see duplicate articles your first port of call should be Duplicate articles not AFD. Please read our Deletion policy.  Uncle G 14:56, 21 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Comment: not exactly a duplicate, more like a regional sub-topic. The main question is whether the sub-topic has been noted in WP:RS as being sufficiently different from its parent topic to the extent that it deserves its own article. This differs by topic; Cantonese cuisine and Cantonese (linguistics) are obviously notable as subdivisions of Chinese cuisine and Chinese language, to give two examples at one extreme; at the other extreme, there's non-notable regional subtopics like "Cantonese American", which was redirected to Chinese American as the result of this AfD discussion. I'll do some reading over the weekend and see what I can come up with in the way of sources. cab 01:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of China-related deletions.   cab 01:03, 22 June 2007 (UTC)
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.