Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cantons of the Corse-du-Sud department


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was keep. (non-admin closure) Cavarrone 07:36, 5 November 2016 (UTC)

Cantons of the Corse-du-Sud department

 * – ( View AfD View log  Stats )

The list is composed entirely of redlinks. I do not think that this is notable. Moxhay (Talk * Contribs) 21:39, 28 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Speedy keep. The French equivalent is a big article with lots of bluelinks, and several good-looking references. A topic and its subtopics can still be notable even if no-one has yet written articles in a foreign language (in this case, English). Narky Blert (talk) 00:35, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of France-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Geography-related deletion discussions. North America1000 15:20, 29 October 2016 (UTC)


 * Keep, passes WP:LISTN, and redlinks are not a reason to delete: Notability of lists (whether titled as "List of Xs" or "Xs") is based on the group ... Because the group or set is notable, the individual items in the list do not need to be independently notable. These seem to be equivalent to state-level voting districts in the United States, which are notable (especially as a set), per WP:GEOLAND. Not sure why this one was picked out for deletion, given that there are 98 other nearly identical list articles (linked at List of cantons of France). Antepenultimate (talk) 22:28, 29 October 2016 (UTC)
 * Keep seems to meet notability for lists. Also, maybe some of these redlinks should be turned into bluelinks. White Arabian Filly  Neigh 19:44, 31 October 2016 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.