Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Canyon of the Vaginas


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was   Delete, consensus is that the article fails the notability guidelines. Davewild (talk) 16:07, 6 July 2008 (UTC)

Canyon of the Vaginas

 * ( [ delete] ) – (View AfD) (View log)

Don't look for this with your GPS. Clearly one of the more interesting hoaxes. Ecoleetage (talk) 01:14, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * delete but not until I call my travel agent. ThuranX (talk) 01:19, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete as a non-notable fictional place. This isn't a hoax so much as a poorly written article about a fictional place, but it's not notable enough by any means. --TheCatalyst31 Reaction•Creation 01:32, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete... not a hoax, but a fictional location that is apparently mentioned in the sources given in the article. It doesn't appear notable as a fictional place, though. -- Kinu t /c  01:38, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * delete no evidence of extensive coverage in reliable sources by authors other than Tim Robbins, fails WP:N. Pete.Hurd (talk) 03:57, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Do Not Delete yes this article is (was) written poorly but that English is not my first language. And the article was labeled as poorly written by me to get the stylistic firs aid as soon as possible instead this label was removed and get AfD. This is not hoax in article is written that it is about fictional place. Article and Book was written by novelist Tom Robbins not movie star Tim Robbins, this typo happened during corrections by user Michael Hardy. Book Wild Ducks Flying Backward was published at last in these countries USA, UK, Germany and Czech Republic and probably some more. I'm not sure if this is non-notable. Because every reader of this when wonders if this place exist or not could use Wikipedia. This place isn't know that well as El Dorado but I will still say that is not non-notable. --Aida (talk) 08:24, 1 July 2008 (UTC)


 * Delete, hoax or non-notable. --Anna Lincoln (talk) 09:06, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete I'm glad you enjoyed the book, but a fictional place mentioned in a story is generally not notable. Emerald City it ain't.  Mandsford (talk) 13:02, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete actually there are a few RS about this, but none I can find where it is the major focus. Given the date of publication, I suspect that any good sources that do exist aren't on-line.  If someone can find one good one, I'd go keep as there are enough weak sources to back it up. Hobit (talk) 13:18, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Delete Non-notable fictional place; fails WP:V and notability for fiction. Ten Pound Hammer  and his otters • (Broken clamshells•Otter chirps) 16:23, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Nevada-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Note: This debate has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions.   --  Fabrictramp  |  talk to me  23:20, 1 July 2008 (UTC)
 * Weak delete as well as there seems from the discussion some evidence of not being a hoax (maybe something is merge and redirectable), but I am persuaded when I also see a fellow inclusionist such as Hobit arguing to delete and as I cannot argue legitimate search term or substantial effort to justify inclusion. Plus, title is a bit odd.  Sincerely, -- Happy Independence Day!   Le Grand Roi des Citrouilles  Tally-ho! 03:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.