Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Capa City 711


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or on a Votes for Undeletion nomination).  No further edits should be made to this page.  

The result of the debate was DELETE and tell the sock puppets that "abstain" means "neutral vote", not "save from deletion". &mdash; J I P | Talk 15:34, 8 October 2005 (UTC)

Capa City 711
was tagged as speedy, probably not Abstain. -- ( &#x263A; drini &#x266B; | &#x260E; ) 02:38, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Has no context and makes no sense (to me at least).  A google search for "Capa City 711" returns 0 results, so doesn't seem there's anything notable to write about anyway.  --W.marsh 03:27, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete. Original research/essay. Andrew pmk | Talk 03:47, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain Its very needed. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 67.82.225.15 (talk • contribs) 2005-10-01 03:50:23 UTC
 * A group of schoolchildren had a vague idea to make something called "Capa City". They couldn't settle on whether they were going to make a game, a comic, or a film.  It doesn't exist, and this article is an outline of their idea, apparently written by them, along with a request for people to contact the group if they are interested.  Wikipedia is not an advertising billboard.  It is not a vehicle that people may use for hawking their ideas for games and films to the rest of the world.  It's an encyclopaedia.  This sort of thing belongs on the authors' own web site.  Delete. Uncle G 13:49, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G. It's skirting close to several speedy categories, but probably isn't quite speediable. Ilmari Karonen 15:52, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete seems like somebody is using wikipedia as a free web server for personal use to me. --rob 17:49, 1 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete per Uncle G. --Metropolitan90 04:02, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Delete as per Uncle G. I can't tell if these people are brilliant or crazy, or both, but this is not a Wikipedia article. MCB 06:58, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain This is the greatest idea since the Colliseum and chicken fingers, it belongs on Wikipedia because Nishant is a genius and must be praised. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.196.171.108 (talk • contribs)
 * Abstain While this hasn't been completed, it's a real cool ida that should at least be finished before it's deleted! --67.81.222.84 22:29, 2 October 2005 (UTC)
 * Abstain This was a project which if realized would influence generations to come. This does not seem to be a 'vanity project.' The Title refers to many things it seems like however abstract they are. There might be some ambiguous statements, but that does not constitue deletion. Let these free spirits continue for Wikipedia should in the bowels of all its knowledge in future years hold this concept, and it does seem as a concept, exist for the future generations. — Preceding unsigned comment added by User: (talk • contribs)
 * Abstain SAVE FROM DELETION!!! This article falls under a category that shouldn't be deleted. --67.81.215.131 01:32, 3 October 2005 (UTC) note--67.81.222.84 01:39, 3 October 2005 (UTC): I fixed this because this person didn't comment correctly and added more then one Abstain67.81.222.84
 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in an undeletion request). No further edits should be made to this page.