Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cape Karma


 * The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review).  No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was soft delete. Based on minimal participation, this uncontroversial nomination is treated as an expired PROD (a.k.a. "soft deletion"). Editors can request the article's undeletion. Liz Read! Talk! 23:05, 24 February 2022 (UTC)

The result was delete. Reclosing this case which was previously closed as a "Soft Delete". This was inappropriate so I am now closing it as a straight "Delete. Liz Read! Talk! 15:29, 8 March 2022 (UTC)

Cape Karma

 * – ( View AfD View log | edits since nomination)

Non notable film, appears to fail WP:NFILM as only 1 review present and no others found. Tagged since August 2021. Donald D23  talk to me  21:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC) Relisting comment: Previously nominated via WP:PROD, ineligible for soft deletion. Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗  plicit  23:47, 17 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Film-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  21:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of United States of America-related deletion discussions.  Donald D23   talk to me  21:30, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Psychology-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:35, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of India-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 * Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Scotland-related deletion discussions.  CAPTAIN RAJU (T) 21:36, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
 *  Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.


 * Delete Insufficient notability established. A search reveals few reviews and no evidence of wider appeal in terms of awards, distribution, etc. Coldupnorth (talk) 23:16, 20 February 2022 (UTC)


 * The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.